“The PCA crew is leagues above
the competition” - Pepsico
"a prior vendor failed to develop
the application, which (Practical) delivered." - Franklin Park
"the application (is) easier to use, with a
much simpler, more intuitive use interface" - Royal Administration Services
"Sometimes it's the things you don't ask for
that are important" - Royal Administration Services
"PCA turned our raw data and algorithms into easy to use
and understand features and reports." - CareScout
"The quality and professionalism ... has been
so outstanding that we want to send you a letter of thanks." - USALCO
"PCA people and applications stand out by
far exceeding our expectations." - USALCO
"The resulting application greatly increas(ed)...
our business effectiveness and efficiency." - The Advest Group
"PCA completes projects
efficiently and effectively" - Pepsico
Split MS Access Application
The Split MS Access approach is a superior method for deploying MS Access applications within a LAN environment (among a relatively small group of End Users). This approach requires “splitting” the MS Access application into 2 MDB files: one that contains the Front-End Application components (User Interface Forms, Queries, code, etc.) and another MDB file that contains the Back-end datastore component.
Splitting an MS Access application into front-end and back-end components can incrementally improve application reliability, but can come at the cost of performance. Generally speaking, splitting an MS Access application is a good idea to support small LAN workgroup environments.
Split MS Access Application Scorecard
| # End Users | 5-10 | Additional users will degrade all metrics |
| Deployment | LAN Only | WAN not recommended |
| Performance | Varies | # of users, records, and datastore size dependent |
| Reliability | Good | Not recommended for business critical applications |
| Data Integrity | Poor | Limited means to insure data quality and completeness |
| Security | Poor | Data is wide open to the LAN |
| Data Limit | < 200 MBs | More data will impede performance and reliability |
| Maintenance | High | Frequent Repair & Compact, Restore |
| # of Records | < 50,000 | More records will impede performance and reliability |
| Internet Access | No | Remote access will substantially impede performance and reliability |
Sharing Data With A Split MS Access Application
Most Popular Pages
Recent Posts: Practical Blog
- Power View empowered practical Smart Client applications
- Tableau vs Qlikview and Tableau vs Spotfire
- Data, Story, View: Prototype and Update
- 2012 starts with Tableau 7.0
- SQL Server 2012 is good for Data Visualization
- Spotfire 4.0 is available
- Introduction of QlikView 11
- VisiCalc jubilee and history of Excel
- Data Visualization 2011: Omniscope 2.6
- Data Visualization 2011: Spotfire 3.3, Silver 2.0
- Data Visualization 2011: Tableau 6.1
- SQL Server 2012 is released for Preview


